Why the study?
HFmrEF has mixed characteristics of HFpEF and HFrEF, and treatment guidelines evolved from recommending HFpEF-like therapies in 2016 to HFrEF-like therapies in 2021, prompting an evaluation of clinical characteristics and treatment practices.
What are the clinical characteristics, treatment practices, and 1-year outcomes of inpatients with HFmrEF in a Vietnamese hospital?
What are the clinical characteristics, treatment practices, and 1-year outcomes of inpatients with HFmrEF in a Vietnamese hospital?
In a Vietnamese cohort of HFmrEF patients, treatment practices aligned closely with HFrEF guidelines, resulting in a 24.7% rate of combined mortality and rehospitalization at 1 year.
Substantial 1-year risk persists in HFmrEF despite high GDMT use; extends Asian data but leaves optimal management open.
Background: The prevalence of patients with heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) remains unchanged regardless of healthcare strategies. HFmrEF has mixed characteristics of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The treatment of HFmrEF was recommended to be similar to the treatment of HFpEF in the 2016 guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) but was changed to those of HFrEF in the 2021 version. Objective: To describe the clinical characteristics of inpatients with HFmrEF with a focus on treatment practices. Methods: A prospective study was conducted on patients diagnosed with HFmrEF who were admitted to the cardiology department of Nhan Dan Gia Dinh hospital from July 2019 to July 2020. Rehospitalization and mortality were followed up by telephone after 1 year. Results: Of a total of 529 heart failure cases admitted to the hospital during the study period, there were 73 patients (13.8%) with HFmrEF. The mean age was 68 years and males comprised 53%. The average hospitalization stay length was 6.7 days. The most common precipitating factors of heart failure were non-adherence (42.5%) and infection (39.7%) followed by hypertensive crisis (8.2%), anemia (6.8%), acute myocardial infarction (5.5%), arrhythmia (4.1%), and hyperthyroidism (2.7%). Ischemic heart disease was the leading cause (61.6%) of HFmrEF, followed by hypertension (12.3%). The rates of HFmrEF patients treated with beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor antagonists, and aldosterone receptor antagonists were 76.1%, 76.71%, 37.73%, and 47.95%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) medications administered between HFmrEF due to ischemic and non-ischemic causes. After 1-year follow-up, the combined outcome of rehospitalization and mortality in HFmrEF was 24.7%. Conclusion: The treatment of HFmrEF was similar to that of HFrEF between 2019 and 2020 at Nhan Dan Gia Dinh hospital and was in accordance with the 2021 ESC guidelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyen et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: