Chloride strongly enhances the inhibition of ACE by various inhibitors, with the degree of dependence varying based on the inhibitor's structural features.
This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
In a previous report [Shapiro, R., Holmquist, B., & Riordan, J. F. (1983) Biochemistry 22, 3850], it was demonstrated that activation of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) by chloride is strongly dependent on substrate structure, and three substrate classes were identified on the basis of activation behavior. The present study examines the chloride dependence of the inhibition of ACE by nine inhibitors [(D-3-mercapto-2-methylpropanoyl)-L-Pro (captopril), N-[1(S)-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl]-L-Ala-L-Pro (MK-422), L-Ala-L-Pro, N-(phenylphosphoryl)-L-Phe-L-Phe, Gly-L-Trp, N-[1(S)-carboxy-5-aminopentyl]-L-Phe-Gly, L-Phe-L-Arg, N alpha-(3-mercaptopropanoyl)-L-Arg, and N alpha-[1(S)-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl]-L-Ala-L-Lys] containing structural features characteristic of the three classes of substrates. Apparent Ki values for all inhibitors are markedly (70-250-fold) decreased by 300 mM chloride. However, the enhancement of inhibition is achieved at significantly lower chloride concentrations with those inhibitors having an ultimate arginine or lysine than with the remainder. This variability parallels that previously found for activation of substrate hydrolysis. The effect of chloride on the individual steps in the formation and dissociation of the steady-state enzyme-inhibitor complexes was determined with the slow-binding inhibitor MK-422. Pre-steady-state analysis indicates that binding of both MK-422 and captopril follows a (minimally) two-step mechanism: (formula; see text) in which rapid formation of an enzyme-inhibitor complex is followed by a slow isomerization.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Chloride effects on ACE inhibitor potency are hypothesis-generating in animals; human studies needed before clinical relevance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shapiro et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: