The interaction of angiotensin converting enzyme with six metal-coordinating [(D-3-mercapto-2-methylpropanoyl)-L-Pro (captopril), N-[1(S)-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl]-L-Ala-L-Pro (MK-422), N-(phenylphosphoryl)-L-Phe-L-Phe, N alpha-(3-mercaptopropanoyl)-L-Arg, N alpha-[1(S)-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl]-Ala-L-Lys, and N-[1(S)-carboxy-5-aminopentyl]-L-Phe-Gly] and three dipeptide inhibitors (Gly-L-Trp, L-Phe-L-Arg, and L-Ala-L-Pro) was examined at pH 7.5 in the presence of 300 mM NaCl. Inhibition modes, apparent Ki [Ki(app)] values, and shapes of 1/v vs. [I] plots were found to vary with the substrate employed. All inhibitors except Phe-Arg were competitive with the substrate furanacryloyl (Fa)-Phe-Gly-Gly, while five of seven tested with Fa-Phe-Phe-Arg as substrate produced mixed patterns. Ki-(app) values for N-[1(S)-carboxy-5-aminopentyl]-L-Phe-Gly, N-(phenylphosphoryl)-L-Phe-L-Phe, Gly-Trp, and MK-422 were 8.3-, 5.5-, 4.7-, and 2.6-fold lower, respectively, when Fa-Phe-Gly-Gly was substrate, compared with values measured with Fa-Phe-Phe-Arg. In contrast, Ki(app) values for Phe-Arg and (3-mercaptopropanoyl)-Arg were lower (2.8- and 2.2-fold, respectively) when Fa-Phe-Phe-Arg was the substrate. Plots of 1/v vs. [I] for most of the inhibitors were nonlinear, to an extent which was also substrate dependent.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shapiro et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: