Constituency pressures are often credited with explaining the votes of individual members of Congress on trade legislation. Such pressures could even lead to the formation of a protectionist coalition among members of Congress as a result of vote trading among the members seeking to represent constituency interests. An analysis of seven votes in the House of Representatives in 1983 and 1984, however, provides little evidence that such constituency pressures were effective and virtually no evidence that any large protectionist coalition was forming at this time. The party affiliation of the members, however, was important to their voting patterns.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James M. Lutz (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: