Why the study?
Does the septal q wave response to exercise detect septal ischemia in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and asymmetric septal hypertrophy?
Does the septal q wave response to exercise detect septal ischemia in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and asymmetric septal hypertrophy?
A decrease in septal q wave amplitude during exercise is a highly sensitive but poorly specific marker for detecting septal ischemia in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Low specificity precludes routine use for detecting septal ischemia in HCM; leaves open its value in prospective validation studies.
BACKGROUND: Small Q waves in the left lateral leads are termed septal q waves, and their response to exercise has been reported to be a marker of septal ischemia in coronary artery disease. Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) sometimes develop septal ischemia in the absence of coronary stenosis, but little data are available concerning the association of the septal q wave response with septal ischemia. METHODS AND RESULTS: Exercise electrocardiography and Tc-99m-tetrofosmin myocardial scintigraphy were recorded to detect myocardial ischemia in 29 HCM patients with asymmetric septal hypertrophy. The septal q wave amplitude was summed up in V(5) and V(6) during exercise testing, and the results were correlated with septal ischemia defined as a regional septal ischemia or a part of diffuse subendocardial ischemia. A decrease in the sum of the septal q wave amplitude during exercise testing yielded a sensitivity of 100% and specificity 33% for regional septal ischemia, and a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 43% for diffuse subendocardial ischemia, although an absent septal q wave at rest provided a low sensitivity for the detection of regional septal ischemia (43%) and diffuse subendocardial ischemia (33%). CONCLUSIONS: The septal q wave response to exercise is a useful marker of septal ischemia in HCM with asymmetric septal hypertrophy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akakabe et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: