Why the study?
Does a very-low-calorie diet alter cardiac contractility, central hemodynamics, and blood pressure in obese patients?
Does a very-low-calorie diet alter cardiac contractility, central hemodynamics, and blood pressure in obese patients?
Short-term semistarvation in obese patients lowers blood pressure primarily through reduced cardiac output and sympathetic tone, without impairing cardiac contractility.
VLCD may lower BP via reduced CO in obese patients without contractility loss; leaves open need for RCTs on long-term effects.
Eight obese patients were studied before and after 2 weeks of treatment by a very-low-calorie diet (VLCD). Cardiac output and central blood volume (pulmonary blood volume and left atrial volume) were determined by indicator dilution (125I-albumin) and radionuclide angiocardiography (first pass and equilibrium technique by [99Tcm]red blood cells). Cardiac output decreased concomitantly with the reduction in oxygen uptake as the calculated systemic arteriovenous difference of oxygen was unaltered. There were no significant decreases in left ventricular contractility indices, i.e. the ejection fraction, the peak ejection rate and changes in end-systolic volume. Also the diastolic function evaluated by the peak filling rate remained normal. Furthermore, no sign of backward failure could be demonstrated since the central blood volume was not significantly increased. Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) declined. The fall in BP was caused by the reduction in cardiac output as the total peripheral resistance was unchanged. Finally, the decline in total blood volume was not significant. These findings together with a reduction in heart rate indicated that a reduced sympathetic tone via increased capacitance of the venous bed was the main operator of a reduced venous return. Thus, the haemodynamic alterations in obese patients during short-term semistarvation may be caused by the fall in oxygen uptake and produced mainly by changes in the sympathetic tone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stokholm et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: