Key result
Global longitudinal strain by speckle-tracking echocardiography was significantly worse in NICM patients with CMR-LGE than those without (-7.6% vs -9.9%, P=0.01).
Why the study?
The study investigated whether LV global longitudinal strain evaluated by speckle-tracking echocardiography could serve as a surrogate marker for CMR-LGE replacement fibrosis in nonischemic cardiomyopathy.
Does global longitudinal strain evaluated by speckle-tracking echocardiography predict replacement fibrosis detected by magnetic resonance-late gadolinium enhancement in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy?
Observational (n=41)
Does global longitudinal strain evaluated by speckle-tracking echocardiography predict replacement fibrosis detected by magnetic resonance-late gadolinium enhancement in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy?
Absolute Event Rate: -7.6% vs -9.9%
p-value: p=.01
Global longitudinal strain by echocardiography may serve as a useful surrogate marker for detecting myocardial replacement fibrosis in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy.
Worse GLS associated with LGE in NICM; hypothesis-generating for surrogate use, needs prospective validation.
Purpose This study aimed to investigate whether left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) evaluated by speckle‐tracking echocardiography (STE) can be used as a surrogate marker for the detection of replacement fibrosis by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). Methods This study analyzed 41 NICM patients who successfully underwent both STE and CMR, and were divided into those with (Group A, n = 18) and those without CMR‐LGE (Group B, n = 23). Echocardiographic indexes, including GLS, were compared between the two groups. Results No significant differences were observed in LV end‐diastolic and end‐systolic volume indexes, LV ejection fraction, mitral E/A, deceleration time, E / e ′, left atrial volume index, and the systolic trans‐tricuspid pressure gradient between Groups A and B. STE‐GLS was significantly worse in Group A than in Group B (−7.6% ± 3.0% vs −9.9% ± 3.2%, P = .01). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that STE‐GLS of −7.9% was the best cut‐off value for detection of CMR‐LGE (sensitivity, 78%; specificity, 74%; and area under the curve, 0.74). Conclusions STE‐GLS may be a potential surrogate marker for the detection of CMR‐LGE‐derived replacement fibrosis in patients with NICM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ota et al. (2021) conducted an observational in nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) (n=41). Global longitudinal strain (GLS) evaluated by speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) vs. Patients without CMR-LGE was evaluated on Global longitudinal strain (GLS) (p=.01). Global longitudinal strain by speckle-tracking echocardiography was significantly worse in NICM patients with CMR-LGE than those without (-7.6% vs -9.9%, P=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: