Key result
Dilated cardiomyopathy was associated with a significantly larger myocardial fibrosis area compared to normal controls (318685.91 vs 1616.0 µ2, p<0.05).
Why the study?
Histopathological changes in dilated cardiomyopathy are frequently nonspecific and often present only in the terminal stage of the disease.
Case-Control (n=40)
No
Absolute Event Rate: 318685.91% vs 1616%
p-value: p=<0.05
Myocardial fibrosis and nuclear pleomorphism are prominent histopathological features in the terminal stages of dilated cardiomyopathy.
Supports fibrosis assessment in DCM histopathology; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Histopathological changes associated with dilated cardiomyopathy (CMD) are frequently nonspecific and often only present in the terminal stage of the disease. The study followed the histopathological and morphometric quantification of fibrosis and nuclear pleomorphism in CMD. We analyzed left ventricle myocardial fragments harvested during autopsy, from 35 cases with clinical diagnosis of CMD and 5 cases of normal myocardium. Fibrosis was present in all CMD cases, with higher values compared with control cases. Nuclear pleomorphism was identified in 18 cases (45%), two of the analyzed parameters, respectively the ratio of nuclear diameters and roundness of nucleus, revealing significant differences in CMD compared to the control cases. Myocardial fibrosis present in all cases of CMD represents a major feature of the disease. The nuclear pleomorphism due to the nuclei change in diameters and size was more pronounced in the vicinity of fibrosis areas, possibly related to this alteration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mitruţ et al. (2019) conducted a case-control in Dilated cardiomyopathy (n=40). Dilated cardiomyopathy vs. Normal myocardium was evaluated on Fibrosis area (µ2) (p=<0.05). Dilated cardiomyopathy was associated with a significantly larger myocardial fibrosis area compared to normal controls (318685.91 vs 1616.0 µ2, p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: