Contemporary roles of registries in clinical cardiology: when do we need randomized trials?
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share
Key result
Clinical registries and randomized controlled trials each have distinct advantages, and their joint use can improve the efficiency and generalizability of cardiovascular research.
Design
Review
Authors
Discussion
Loading...
Member takes
Implication
Combining clinical registries with randomized controlled trials offers a pragmatic approach to generate robust, generalizable, and cost-effective evidence in cardiology.
PICO
P
Population
Cardiovascular disease
E
Exposure / Comparator
Clinical registries vs Randomized controlled trials
Combining clinical registries with randomized controlled trials offers a pragmatic approach to generate robust, generalizable, and cost-effective evidence in cardiology.
Cite This Study
Ieva et al. (2014) conducted a review in Cardiovascular disease. Clinical registries vs. Randomized controlled trials was evaluated. Clinical registries and randomized controlled trials each have distinct advantages, and their joint use can improve the efficiency and generalizability of cardiovascular research.
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share