Protamine titration is the gold standard for measuring unfractionated heparin concentration to establish therapeutic APTT ranges.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports protamine titration for UFH range calibration; leaves open prospective validation against modern assays.
Protamine titration is the gold standard method for the measurement of unfractionated heparin (UFH) concentration in plasma. Protamine titration produces reliable and reproducible results; however it is -generally not considered a convenient assay for current clinical management of UFH as it is not readily automated (Olson et al. Arch Pathol Lab Med 122(9):782-798, 1998). Early clinical trials of UFH therapy determined that a heparin concentration of 0.2-0.4 U/ml by protamine titration correlated to an APTT of 1.5-2.5 times higher compared to baseline values produced desirable UFH safety and efficacy outcomes (Hull et al. N Engl J Med 315(18):1109-1114, 1986; Hull et al. N Engl J Med 322:1260-1264, 1990; Turpie et al. N Engl J Med 320:352-357, 1989; Brill-Edwards et al. Ann Intern Med 119(2):104-109, 1993; Hull Int Angiol 14(1):32-34, 1995). Such studies paved the way to the current view that it is no longer ideal to manage UFH based solely upon a 1.5-2.5 times prolongation of the "normal" APTT. Most advisory bodies recommend therapeutic APTTs be determined by correlating APTT results with therapeutic UFH levels as measured by anti-Xa assay (0.35-0.7 U/ml) or protamine titration (0.2-0.4 U/ml) (Hirsh and Raschke. Chest 126(3):188S-203S, 2004) (see Note 1). The concentration of UFH in a sample is measured by determining the amount of protamine required to return the thrombin clotting time (TCT) test (prolonged by UFH) to a pre-UFH level (Laffan and Manning. Dacie and Lewis: practical haematology. Churchill Livingstone: London, 2001).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fiona Newall (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: