Experimental rhinovirus type 2 infection caused more frequent and severe clinical symptoms in subjects after 5 months of polar isolation compared to non-isolated volunteers in England.
RCT (n=47)
Double blind conditions with placebo or rhinovirus type 2
Double-blind
Yes
17 men in polar isolation and 30 healthy volunteers in England were experimentally infected with rhinovirus type 2 to compare clinical and virological responses.
Rhinovirus type 2 (RV2) DP29 vs Non-isolated volunteers (Salisbury) or Placebo (10^5 TCID50)
Clinical reactions to 10^5 TCID50 RV2 DP29
Absolute Event Rate: 88.9% vs 33.3%
After five months of total isolation a wintering party of seventeen British Antarctic Survey (BAS) personnel was inoculated under double blind concitions with placebo, or rhinovirus type 2 which had been propagated in tissue culture. The clinical and virological responses of these subjects were compared with those of volunteers in England who received a similar dose of the same strain. The virus used was apparently partly attenuated for man; at the dosage used its effects in England were similar to a smaller dose of an unattenuated strain, but in the Antarctic it caused relatively severe infections. Both the symptoms and the laboratory evidence of virus infection appeared to be more pronounced in the BAS subjects than in the volunteers in England who received the same challenge. In the former group the infection readily spread to those who were originally given placebo. In the BAS subjects serum antibody titres were well maintained during the isolation period but a significant fall in nasal immunoglobulin concentration was recorded during the 5 months of isolation after the virus challenge. Possible mechanisms for the increased sensitivity to rhinovirus of subjects who have been totally isolated in a small closed community are discussed.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Michael Holmes
The University of Queensland
Sylvia E. Reed
University of London
E. J. Stott
National Institute for Biological Standards and Control
Journal of Hygiene
British Antarctic Survey
Salisbury District Hospital
Newbury College
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Holmes et al. (Tue,) conducted a rct in Experimental rhinovirus infection (n=47). Rhinovirus type 2 (RV2) DP29 vs. Non-isolated volunteers (Salisbury) or Placebo was evaluated on Clinical reactions to 10^5 TCID50 RV2 DP29. Experimental rhinovirus type 2 infection caused more frequent and severe clinical symptoms in subjects after 5 months of polar isolation compared to non-isolated volunteers in England.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1ef9d616ec2d13766b5d3e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022172400055303