Key result
Strict blood pressure control reduced ESRD risk in CKD patients with proteinuria ≥0.44 g/g (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.64-0.92) and death in those with GFR <30 (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.59-0.92).
Why the study?
The study explored whether the effect of intensive blood pressure control on kidney and death outcomes varies across chronic kidney disease subgroups defined by baseline proteinuria, glomerular filtration rate, age, and body mass index.
Does intensive blood pressure control reduce the risk of end-stage renal disease or death in subgroups of patients with chronic kidney disease?
Cohort (n=1,907)
Does intensive blood pressure control reduce the risk of end-stage renal disease or death in subgroups of patients with chronic kidney disease?
Intensive blood pressure lowering provides targeted benefits for ESRD and mortality in specific high-risk CKD subgroups, such as those with higher proteinuria or lower GFR, without increasing risk in others.
Supports targeted strict BP control in high-proteinuria or low-GFR CKD subgroups; leaves open need for RCT confirmation before practice change.
Background Our objective was to explore the effect of intensive blood pressure ( BP ) control on kidney and death outcomes among subgroups of patients with chronic kidney disease divided by baseline proteinuria, glomerular filtration rate, age, and body mass index. Methods and Results We included 840 MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) trial and 1067 AASK (African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension) participants. We used Cox models to examine whether the association between intensive BP control and risk of end‐stage renal disease ( ESRD ) or death is modified by baseline proteinuria (≥0.44 versus <0.44 g/g), glomerular filtration rate (≥30 versus <30 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 ), age (≥40 versus <40 years), or body mass index (≥30 versus <30 kg/m 2 ). The median follow‐up was 14.9 years. Strict (versus usual) BP control was protective against ESRD (hazard ratio [HR] ESRD , 0.77; 95% CI , 0.64–0.92) among those with proteinuria ≥0.44 g/g but not proteinuria <0.44 g/g. Strict (versus usual) BP control was protective against death ( HR death , 0.73; 95% CI , 0.59–0.92) among those with glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 but not glomerular filtration rate ≥30 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 ( HR death , 0.98; 95% CI , 0.84–1.15). Strict (versus usual) BP control was protective against ESRD among those ≥40 years ( HR ESRD , 0.82; 95% CI , 0.71–0.94) but not <40 years. Strict (versus usual) BP control was also protective against ESRD among those with body mass index ≥30 kg/m 2 ( HR ESRD , 0.75; 95% CI , 0.61–0.92) but not body mass index <30 kg/m 2 . Conclusions The ESRD and all‐cause mortality benefits of intensive BP lowering may not be uniform across all subgroups of patients with chronic kidney disease. But intensive BP lowering was not associated with increased risk of ESRD or death among any subgroups that we examined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ku et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Chronic kidney disease (n=1,907). Intensive blood pressure control vs. Usual blood pressure control was evaluated on End-stage renal disease (ESRD) among patients with proteinuria ≥0.44 g/g (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.64-0.92). Strict blood pressure control reduced ESRD risk in CKD patients with proteinuria ≥0.44 g/g (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.64-0.92) and death in those with GFR <30 (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.59-0.92).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: