Key result
Normalized RMSSD detects AF and CHF with ~91% accuracy using 16-beat RR intervals.
Why the study?
Does automatic detection using statistical methods on short RRI time series accurately identify atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure?
Observational (n=121)
Does automatic detection using statistical methods on short RRI time series accurately identify atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure?
Normalized RMSSD of short (16-beat) RR interval time series provides highly accurate, automated detection of both atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure.
Short RR normalized RMSSD may aid automated AF/CHF detection; leaves open prospective clinical validation.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) and Congestive heart failure (CHF) are increasingly widespread, costly, deadly diseases and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In this study, we analyzed three statistical methods for automatic detection of AF and CHF based on the randomness, variability and complexity of the heart beat interval, which is RRI time series. Specifically, we used short RRI time series with 16 beats and employed the normalized root mean square of successive RR differences (RMSSD), the sample entropy and the Shannon entropy. The detection performance was analyzed using four large well documented databases, namely the MIT-BIH Atrial fibrillation (n=23), the MIT-BIH Normal Sinus Rhythm (n=18), the BIDMC Congestive Heart Failure (n=13) and the Congestive Heart Failure RRI databases (n=25). Using thresholds by Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves, we found that the normalized RMSSD provided the highest accuracy. The overall sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for AF and CHF were 0.8649, 0.9331 and 0.9104, respectively. Regarding CHF detection, the detection rate of CHF (NYHA III-IV) was 0.9113 while CHF (NYHA I-II) was 0.7312, which shows that the detection rate of CHF with higher severity is higher than that of CHF with lower severity. For the clinical 24 hour data (n=42), the overall sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for AF and CHF were 0.8809, 0.9406 and 0.9108, respectively, using normalized RMSSD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoon et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation and Congestive heart failure (n=121). Normalized root mean square of successive RR differences (RMSSD) vs. Sample entropy and Shannon entropy was evaluated on Overall accuracy for AF and CHF detection. Using a 16-beat short RR interval time series, the normalized RMSSD method achieved an overall accuracy of 0.9104 for the automatic detection of atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: