Key result
Dipyridamole stress myocardial perfusion imaging was safe with no serious adverse events in patients with aortic stenosis, and increased post-stress lung-heart ratio predicted abnormal perfusion (OR 1.2).
Why the study?
Vasodilator myocardial perfusion imaging for aortic stenosis is controversial regarding safety and accuracy, and its utility after aortic valve interventions remains unclear.
Is ECG-gated dipyridamole myocardial perfusion imaging safe and clinically valuable for evaluating ischemia in patients with aortic stenosis?
Observational (n=47)
No
Is ECG-gated dipyridamole myocardial perfusion imaging safe and clinically valuable for evaluating ischemia in patients with aortic stenosis?
Dipyridamole stress MPI is safe in patients with mild to moderate aortic stenosis and can help identify microvascular dysfunction or exclude obstructive CAD.
Dipyridamole stress MPI appears safe in aortic stenosis without serious events; hypothesis-generating for perfusion prediction and needs prospective validation before practice change.
The role of vasodilator myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) for aortic stenosis (AS) is controversial due to safety and accuracy concerns. In addition, its utility after aortic valve (AV) interventions remains unclear. Patients with AS who underwent thallium-201-gated dipyridamole MPI using a cadmium-zinc-telluride camera were retrospectively reviewed and divided into three groups: mild AS, moderate-to-severe AS, and prior AV interventions. Patients with coronary artery disease with ≥50% stenosis, severe arrhythmia, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40%, left bundle branch block or no follow-up were excluded. Relationships between the severity of AS, clinical characteristics, hemodynamic response, serious adverse events (SAE) and MPI parameters were analyzed. None of the 47 patients had SAE, including significant hypotension or LVEF reduction. The moderate-to-severe AS group had higher summed stress scores (SSSs) and depressed LVEF than the mild AS group, however there were no differences after AV interventions. SSS was positively correlated with AV mean pressure gradient, post-stress lung-heart ratio (LHRs), and post-stress end-diastolic volume (EDVs) (P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, LHRs and EDVs were independent contributors to SSS. Dipyridamole-induced ischemia and LV dysfunction is common, and dipyridamole stress could be a safe diagnostic tool in evaluation and follow-up in patients with AS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Aortic stenosis (n=47). Dipyridamole stress myocardial perfusion imaging was evaluated on Abnormal summed stress score (SSS ≥ 4) associated with post-stress lung-heart ratio (LHRs) (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.03-1.39, p=0.02). Dipyridamole stress myocardial perfusion imaging was safe with no serious adverse events in patients with aortic stenosis, and increased post-stress lung-heart ratio predicted abnormal perfusion (OR 1.2).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: