Key result
A modified Cox maze IV procedure reduced mean ablation time compared to the standard procedure with similar long-term freedom from atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
Does a modified Cox maze IV procedure improve freedom from atrial fibrillation compared to the standard Cox maze IV procedure in patients undergoing concomitant valve surgery?
RCT (n=120)
randomized
Does a modified Cox maze IV procedure improve freedom from atrial fibrillation compared to the standard Cox maze IV procedure in patients undergoing concomitant valve surgery?
The modified Cox maze IV procedure is a simpler, faster technique that provides comparable freedom from atrial fibrillation to the standard procedure in patients undergoing concomitant valve surgery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Offers a faster alternative with equivalent AF outcomes during valve surgery; extends options for simplified maze techniques in RCTs.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of a simplified surgical treatment method for atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Between September 2012 and October 2013, 120 patients (mean age, 52.3 ± 8.8 years) underwent valve surgery and concomitant bipolar radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of AF. Patients were randomized to a Cox maze IV procedure (CMP-IV) group (n = 60) or a modified CMP-IV (MCMP-IV) group (n = 60). Freedom from AF was defined as freedom from any left atrial arrhythmia lasting <30 s and no requirement of antiarrhythmic drugs after 6 months. Data were recorded at postoperative follow-up examinations, which were scheduled at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months, and annually thereafter. RESULTS: No ablation-related complications occurred in either group. The mean ablation time was longer in the CMP-IV group than in the MCMP-IV group (18.5 ± 1.7 vs 16.6 ± 1.6 min, P < 0.001). The mean follow-up time was 32.4 ± 3.6 months (range, 26-39 months). Freedom from AF tended to be higher, but not significantly so, among the MCMP-IV group than among the CMP-IV group over the entire follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: The MCMP-IV is an effective surgical procedure for the treatment of AF. In certain patients, such as those with anatomic variations of the pulmonary veins, the MCMP-IV is simpler than the CMP-IV. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION ID: ChiCTR-TRC-12002742.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in Atrial fibrillation (n=120). Modified Cox maze IV procedure (MCMP-IV) vs. Cox maze IV procedure (CMP-IV) was evaluated on Freedom from AF (freedom from any left atrial arrhythmia lasting <30 s and no requirement of antiarrhythmic drugs after 6 months). A modified Cox maze IV procedure reduced mean ablation time compared to the standard procedure with similar long-term freedom from atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: