Key result
Percutaneous coronary intervention in women with ULMCA disease was associated with better survival and lower MACE compared with CABG, a difference not observed in men.
Why the study?
Gender is currently not considered when selecting a revascularization strategy for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease.
Does percutaneous coronary intervention improve outcomes compared to coronary artery bypass grafting in male and female patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease?
Cohort (n=2,138)
Does percutaneous coronary intervention improve outcomes compared to coronary artery bypass grafting in male and female patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease?
PCI may be the preferred revascularization strategy over CABG for women with unprotected left main coronary artery disease due to better survival and lower MACE.
Does not support changing ULMCA revascularization practice by sex; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
Currently, gender is not considered in the choice of the revascularization strategy for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease. This study analyzed the effect of gender on the outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with ULMCA disease. Females who had PCI (n = 328) were compared with females who had CABG (n = 132) and PCI in males (n = 894) was compared with CABG (n = 784). Females with CABG had higher overall hospital mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) than females with PCI. Male patients with CABG had higher MACE; however, mortality did not differ between males with CABG vs PCI. In female patients, follow-up mortality was significantly higher in CABG patients, and target lesion revascularization was higher in patients with PCI. Male patients had no difference in mortality and MACE between groups; however, MI was higher with CABG, and congestive heart failure was higher with PCI. In conclusion, women with ULMCA disease treated with PCI could have better survival with lower MACE compared with CABG. These differences were not evident in males treated with either CABG or PCI. PCI could be the preferred revascularization strategy in women with ULMCA disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daoulah et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease (n=2,138). Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was evaluated on Hospital mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Percutaneous coronary intervention in women with ULMCA disease was associated with better survival and lower MACE compared with CABG, a difference not observed in men.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: