Key result
Relative ST analysis demonstrated a significantly higher specificity for detecting cord acidaemia compared to conventional absolute ST analysis (100% vs 40%, p=0.031) while maintaining equal sensitivity.
Why the study?
Variation in fetal electrical heart axis affects baseline T/QRS values in conventional ST analysis, prompting exploration of whether relative ST analysis better diagnoses cord acidaemia.
Does relative ST analysis improve diagnostic accuracy for cord acidaemia compared to conventional absolute ST analysis in term human fetuses during labour?
Case-Control (n=20)
Yes
Does relative ST analysis improve diagnostic accuracy for cord acidaemia compared to conventional absolute ST analysis in term human fetuses during labour?
Absolute Event Rate: 100% vs 40%
p-value: p=0.031
Relative ST analysis of fetal electrocardiograms during labour significantly improves specificity for detecting impending cord acidaemia compared to conventional absolute ST analysis.
May improve specificity for cord acidaemia detection; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
INTRODUCTION: The additional value of ST analysis during labour is uncertain. In ST analysis, a T/QRS baseline value is calculated from the fetal electrocardiogram and successive T/QRS ratios are compared to this baseline. However, variation in the orientation of the electrical heart axis between fetuses may yield different T/QRS baseline values. In case of a higher T/QRS baseline value more ST events are encountered, although not always related to perinatal outcome. We hypothesised that we can partly correct for this effect by analysing T/QRS rises as a percentage from baseline (relative ST analysis). This study aimed to explore whether relative ST analysis has better diagnostic value for cord acidaemia compared to conventional ST analysis, where predefined fixed T/QRS ratios are used. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A case-control study was performed in 20 term human fetuses during labour; 10 cases (umbilical cord artery pH <7.05 at birth, defining acidaemia) and 10 controls (pH >7.20) were included. The fetal electrocardiogram was recorded using a STAN monitor. We electronically extracted all T/QRS values, baseline and episodic ST events from the STAN monitor and calculated the relative T/QRS changes. The cut-off for relative ST events was determined in a receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve at optimal specificity for cord acidaemia. Parameters of interest were area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC curve for relative ST events and test performance of both conventional and relative ST analysis. RESULTS: Relative ST analysis showed an AUC of 0.99. The optimal cut-off value for relative T/QRS rise was determined at 0.70. Relative vs conventional (absolute) ST analysis showed a specificity of 100% vs 40% (p = 0.031); sensitivity 90% vs 90%; positive likelihood ratio infinity vs 1.5; negative likelihood ratio 0.10 vs 0.25, respectively. CONCLUSION: Relative ST analysis seems to be a promising method to detect impending fetal acidaemia during labour. Further studies are required to determine the diagnostic accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hulsenboom et al. (2019) conducted a case-control in Fetal acidaemia during labour (n=20). Relative ST analysis (RSTAN) vs. Conventional absolute ST analysis (ASTAN) was evaluated on Specificity for detecting cord acidaemia (p=0.031). Relative ST analysis demonstrated a significantly higher specificity for detecting cord acidaemia compared to conventional absolute ST analysis (100% vs 40%, p=0.031) while maintaining equal sensitivity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: