PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 11, 1972BMJ310 citationsOpen Access

Immediate Effects of Intravenous Verapamil in Cardiac Arrhythmias

LSL SchamrothDKD M KriklerCGCeline Garrett

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the immediate effects of intravenous verapamil on various cardiac arrhythmias.
  • Intravenous verapamil was administered to 181 patients with cardiac arrhythmias.

Structured PICO

Does intravenous verapamil improve or convert various cardiac arrhythmias in affected patients?

P
Population
181 patients with various cardiac arrhythmias, including sinus, idionodal, and idioventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, and pre-excitation syndromes.
I
Intervention
Verapamil administered by intravenous injection.
O
Outcome
Immediate effects on cardiac rhythm and rate (including slowing of automaticity, ventricular response rate, and conversion to sinus rhythm).surrogate

Intravenous verapamil is highly effective and safe for the immediate management of various cardiac arrhythmias, particularly for converting paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia to sinus rhythm and controlling ventricular rate in atrial fibrillation.

Abstract

Verapamil was administered by intravenous injection to 181 patients with various cardiac arrhythmias. The automaticity of the cardiac pacemaker was slowed in sinus, idionodal, and idioventricular tachycardia. In atrial fibrillation the drug usually slowed the ventricular response and often made it regular. In some cases atrial flutter was converted to sinus rhythm, the ventricular response being reduced in the remainder. Conversion of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia to sinus rhythm was consistently achieved. A favourable response occurred in four patients in whom arrhythmias were associated with pre-excitation syndromes. There were no adverse clinical side effects.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schamroth et al. (1972) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fac9131c606dfff260d32https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.5801.660
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper