Key result
Urgent open conversion post-failed EVAR is linked to ~600% higher early mortality versus elective conversion.
Why the study?
The incidence of late open surgical conversions has increased, presenting technical challenges in late conversion surgery of failed EVAR due to previously deployed endografts.
Cohort (n=16)
No
Hazard Ratio: 7 (95% CI 2.07–23.66)
Absolute Event Rate: 75% vs 12.5%
p-value: p=0.001
Emergent open surgical conversions for failed EVAR are associated with significantly higher mortality than elective procedures, highlighting the critical need for close surveillance and timely elective intervention.
Urgent conversion after failed EVAR carries high mortality; hypothesis-generating for closer surveillance to reduce emergent cases.
Background: The incidence of late open surgical conversions (OSCs) has recently increased. Vascular surgeons face additional technical challenges in late conversion surgery of failed endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) due to the presence of a previously deployed endograft. Based on our institutional experience, this study aimed to delineate methods to improve late open conversion outcomes, proposing solutions for technical challenges. Methods: All preoperative OSC data on failed EVARs operated in our Cardiovascular Surgery Clinic between January 2017 and January 2024 were evaluated retrospectively. Study endpoints included early (30-day or in-hospital) and late follow-up outcomes. Early outcomes included perioperative mortality and morbidities, intensive care unit (ICU) period, and length of hospital stay (LOS). The main outcome of interest during follow-up was overall survival. Results: Sixteen patients in our hospital, comprising eight elective and eight emergency procedures, underwent OSCs following EVAR. The difference between the 30-day mortality rates for the elective and urgent late conversions was significant (p < 0.001). Of these patients, 15 were male, with a mean age of 70.8 years (range: 62–80). Preoperative cardiac shock status and low hematocrit level (<20%) were independent mortality factors (p < 0.001). The ICU period was 8.7 ± 5.3 days (2–20 days) on average, and LOS was 17.3 ± 8.4 (6–29 days) days on average. The mean time to open surgical conversion in this cohort was 44.4 ± 16.8 months. The 5-year overall survival rate was 43.75%. Conclusions: The incidence of open surgical conversion is notably growing. Emergent open surgical conversions exhibit poorer mortality outcomes compared to elective procedures. Further data are essential to evaluate the ramifications of expanding the use of EVAR beyond the instructions for use (IFU) guidelines. The procedures involving patients who challenge the IFU criteria should be conducted at experienced centers and require close monitoring. Open surgical repair (OSR) as the initial treatment opportunity could be an alternative strategy for improving outcomes in this patient cohort.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aytekin et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Failed endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) (n=16). Urgent open surgical conversion (ruptured aneurysm) vs. Elective open surgical conversion was evaluated on Early (30-day or in-hospital) mortality (HR 7.00, 95% CI 2.07-23.66, p=0.001). Urgent open surgical conversion for ruptured aneurysms following failed EVAR was associated with a significantly higher early mortality rate compared to elective conversion (75% vs 12.5%, HR 7.00).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: