Why the study?
Do fixed-dose combinations improve patient compliance and reduce cardiovascular events compared to monotherapies in hypertensive individuals?
Do fixed-dose combinations improve patient compliance and reduce cardiovascular events compared to monotherapies in hypertensive individuals?
Fixed-dose combinations for hypertension may improve patient compliance and persistence, leading to better blood pressure control and reduced cardiovascular events and healthcare costs.
Supports adherence with fixed-dose combinations in hypertension; leaves open event reduction in prospective trials.
It is well documented that reducing blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive individuals reduces the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events. Despite this, many patients with hypertension remain untreated or inadequately treated, and fail to reach the recommended BP goals. Suboptimal BP control, whilst arising from multiple causes, is often due to poor patient compliance and/or persistence, and results in a significant health and economic burden on society. The use of fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) for the treatment of hypertension has the potential to increase patient compliance and persistence. When compared with antihypertensive monotherapies, FDCs may also offer equivalent or better efficacy, and the same or improved tolerability. As a result, FDCs have the potential to reduce both the CV event rates and the non-drug healthcare costs associated with hypertension. When FDCs are adopted for the treatment of hypertension, issues relating to copayment, formulary restrictions and therapeutic reference pricing must be addressed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruilope et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: