Key result
Selective increase in pulmonary artery pressure decreases left ventricular diastolic compliance dependent on an intact pericardium, whereas aortic pressure increase increases right ventricular end-systolic elastance independent of the pericardium.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether the mechanisms underlying ventricular interdependence differ when caused by primary right versus left ventricular pressure loading.
Does selective ventricular pressure loading alter ventricular interdependence differently depending on the loaded ventricle and pericardial restraint in a porcine model?
Does selective ventricular pressure loading alter ventricular interdependence differently depending on the loaded ventricle and pericardial restraint in a porcine model?
Ventricular interdependence mechanisms differ based on the loaded ventricle, with RV-to-LV diastolic interactions dependent on the pericardium and LV-to-RV systolic interactions independent of it.
Suggests pericardial modulation of RV-LV interactions in pigs; leaves open translation to human ventricular interdependence.
New Findings What is the central question of this study? Are the mechanisms that cause ventricular interdependence different when due to primary right to left ventricular pressure loading? What is the main finding and its importance? An instantaneous selective increase in aortic pressure causes an immediate increase in right ventricular end‐systolic pressure independent of the pericardium, whereas a selective increase in pulmonary artery pressure decreases left ventricular diastolic compliance owing to a subsequent increasing right ventricular end‐diastolic volume as a function of an intact pericardium limiting biventricular volume. Changes in contraction synchrony of either ventricle do not appear to be causing these effects. Abstract I characterized the dynamic factors determining ventricular interdependence with and without the pericardium. I measured right (RV) and left ventricular (LV) pressures and volumes simultaneously using conductance catheters in seven pentobarbitone‐anaesthetized open‐chested 5‐ to 7‐week‐old piglets. I studied these effects during apnoea, inferior vena caval occlusion and rapid partial aortic and pulmonary arterial occlusions. Conductance catheter‐defined long‐axis regional volumes were assessed to define regional contractile synchrony. Closed‐pericardium measures were made from an initial (baseline) volume, then after two 20 ml kg −1 fluid loads followed by an open‐pericardium step. Baseline RV and LV volumes were similar. Aortic occlusion increased LV pressures and volumes and RV end‐systolic pressure such that RV end‐systolic elastance increased without changes in RV contraction synchrony, not affected by the pericardium. Pulmonary artery occlusion increased RV end‐systolic pressure but not end‐systolic volume. On the subsequent beat, RV end‐diastolic pressure increased, whereas LV end‐diastolic volume and diastolic compliance decreased. These effects were attenuated by opening the pericardium. Contraction synchrony across longitudinal segments was unaltered by either aortic or pulmonary artery occlusion. I conclude that the determinants of systolic and diastolic ventricular interdependence are different. Increasing RV pressures causes diastolic RV‐to‐LV interdependence, decreasing LV diastolic compliance and dependent on an intact pericardium. An increase in LV end‐systolic pressure increases RV end‐systolic elastance independent of the pericardium and has a minimal effect on RV diastolic function or contraction synchrony.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael R. Pinsky (2020) studied Healthy (ventricular interdependence model) (n=7). Rapid partial aortic and pulmonary arterial occlusions vs. Baseline (apnoea, inferior vena caval occlusion) was evaluated on Right and left ventricular pressures and volumes. Selective increase in pulmonary artery pressure decreases left ventricular diastolic compliance dependent on an intact pericardium, whereas aortic pressure increase increases right ventricular end-systolic elastance independent of the pericardium.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: