Key result
Short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (≤3 months) significantly reduced the risk of the primary endpoint compared to extended-term therapy (>12 months) in diabetic patients after PCI with DES (OR 0.48).
Why the study?
The optimal DAPT duration and subsequent monotherapy scheme in patients with diabetes mellitus after PCI with DES needed evaluation for efficacy and safety.
Does short-term DAPT followed by monotherapy improve clinical outcomes compared to longer DAPT durations in diabetic patients after PCI with DES?
Meta-Analysis (n=20,536)
Does short-term DAPT followed by monotherapy improve clinical outcomes compared to longer DAPT durations in diabetic patients after PCI with DES?
Odds Ratio: 0.48 (95% CI 0.25–0.85)
Short-term DAPT (≤3 months) followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy may be the optimal strategy for diabetic patients after PCI with DES, reducing composite primary endpoints without increasing stent thrombosis or major bleeding compared to extended DAPT.
May support short-term DAPT in diabetic patients after DES-PCI; extends network evidence on optimal duration.
Background: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of short-term (≤3-month) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), midterm (6-month) DAPT, standard-term (12-month) DAPT and extended-term (>12-month) DAPT in diabetes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES). To Compare discontinuation of DAPT followed by aspirin with P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy for detailed optimal scheme. Methods: Randomized, controlled trials were searched using PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane library and clinicaltrials.gov. up to October 10, 2020. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted with a random-effect model. Results: A total of 18 randomized trials encompassing 20536 diabetic patients were included. Network analysis showed that short-term DAPT is best for reducing primary endpoint, which is superior to extended-term DAPT (odds ratio 0.48, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.85). Standard-term was also associated with reduce risk of primary endpoint in comparison with prolonged DAPT (0.56, 0.32 to 0.90). There was no noticeable difference with respect to primary endpoint between short-term DAPT followed by aspirin monotherapy and P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy. No significant differences were observed in secondary endpoints, including all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, MI, stroke, TVR, definite or probable stent thrombosis and major bleeding. Conclusions: Short-term DAPT was associated with the better primary endpoint benefit for patients with diabetes after PCI with DES, compared with extended-term DAPT. Although the optimal duration should balance risk-benefit ratio between personal ischemic and bleeding events, this study suggested short term DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy may be the optimal therapy for most diabetes after PCI with DES.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
An et al. (2021) conducted a meta-analysis in Diabetes Mellitus after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Drug-Eluting Stent (n=20,536). Short-term (≤3-month) dual antiplatelet therapy vs. Extended-term (>12-month) dual antiplatelet therapy was evaluated on Primary endpoint (as defined in each trial) (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.25-0.85). Short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (≤3 months) significantly reduced the risk of the primary endpoint compared to extended-term therapy (>12 months) in diabetic patients after PCI with DES (OR 0.48).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: