Bibliometric analysis reveals potential for open data strategies to enhance public health interventions globally.
Background: In the wake of the pandemic, open data has made possible mapping, evaluating, and monitoring the COVID-19 rate of transmission at a local, national, and global level. Such a strategy follows WHO's efforts to provide updated and useful information in order to tackle public health issues and provide resources for research in the health sciences. Methods: A bibliometric analysis of the literature was conducted. Results: Published papers on open data impact on infection risk dramatically increased in the observed period of time (2018–21). Furthermore, it becomes apparent that, while COVID-19-related literature led to such a "critical mass" of publications in 2018–21, papers about open data, but antimicrobial resistance and healthcare associated infections are very few or absent. Conclusion: An open data strategy is beneficial in tracking, studying, and adopting measures not only for Covid-19 but also for providing nurses and allied healthcare professionals with firm evidences upon which to develop health plans.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Monaco et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: