Key result
Altered fasting glycemia was not a significant predictor of all-cause mortality compared to normal glucose regulation (OR 1.23; 95% CI 0.77-1.98), though it increased hospital stay and complications.
Why the study?
Does altered fasting glycemia increase complications and mortality in cardiac patients admitted to rehabilitation?
Cohort (n=2,490)
Does altered fasting glycemia increase complications and mortality in cardiac patients admitted to rehabilitation?
Odds Ratio: 1.23 (95% CI 0.77–1.98)
Altered fasting glycemia in cardiac rehabilitation patients is associated with higher in-hospital complication rates and longer stays, but unlike known diabetes, it is not a significant predictor of 3-year all-cause mortality.
Altered fasting glycemia was associated with longer stays and complications but not mortality in cardiac rehab; leaves open targeted management trials.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hospitalized patients after acute cardiovascular events have poorer prognosis if glucose regulation is diagnosed as abnormal. We compared the short and long-term outcome of patients with newly diagnosed altered fasting glycemia (AFG) to that of known diabetic patients and patients with normal glucose regulation (NGR) after admission to cardiac rehabilitation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 2490 consecutive patients. Three groups were identified: known diabetes mellitus (n = 540, 22%), fasting glycemia above 110 mg/dl (AFG, n = 269, 11%), and fasting glycemia 110 mg/dl or less (NGR, n = 1681, 67%). Clinical variables, complications, and all-cause mortality were evaluated. RESULTS: At follow-up (median 3.1 ± 2.4 years), after adjustment for age, sex, BMI, left ventricular ejection fraction, history of coronary artery disease, AFG had a significantly longer hospital stay versus NGR (21 ± 8 versus 20 ± 8 days; P = 0.019) and higher risk of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (P = 0.041), pleural/pericardial effusions (P < 0.001), skin complications (P = 0.033), other events (P = 0.001), and blood tests (urea: P = 0.007; white blood cells: P = 0.002; neutrophils: P < 0.001; creatinine: P = 0.022). All-cause mortality was significantly higher in diabetes mellitus versus NGR (odds ratio 1.61, 95% confidence interval 1.17-2.21); a nonsignificant trend was observed in AFG versus NGR (odds ratio 1.23, 95% confidence interval 0.77-1.98). CONCLUSIONS: A high AFG prevalence in cardiac patients admitted to rehabilitation was observed. AFG patients were more vulnerable than NGR patients, had higher complication rates independently of covariates, and required longer hospital stay. AFG was not a significant predictor of all-cause mortality at 3 years, whereas DM was.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masnaghetti et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Acute cardiovascular events requiring cardiac rehabilitation (n=2,490). Altered fasting glycemia (AFG) vs. Normal glucose regulation (NGR) was evaluated on All-cause mortality (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.77-1.98). Altered fasting glycemia was not a significant predictor of all-cause mortality compared to normal glucose regulation (OR 1.23; 95% CI 0.77-1.98), though it increased hospital stay and complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: