Key result
Preventive PCI of vulnerable plaques may reduce cardiovascular events in high-risk patients.
Why the study?
Vulnerable coronary plaques cause most coronary thromboses and cardiovascular events, generating interest in preventive percutaneous coronary intervention alongside pharmacological therapy.
Does preventive percutaneous coronary intervention reduce cardiovascular events in patients with coronary vulnerable plaques?
Does preventive percutaneous coronary intervention reduce cardiovascular events in patients with coronary vulnerable plaques?
Preventive PCI of angiographically non-significant but high-risk vulnerable plaques may reduce future cardiovascular events, though current evidence requires further validation before routine clinical adoption.
Caution against routine preventive PCI of vulnerable plaques; leaves open benefit pending randomized validation.
Vulnerable or high-risk coronary plaques are usually referred to as angiographically mild to moderate lesions characterized by a large plaque burden, positive vessel remodeling, thin fibrous cap, and large necrotic/lipid core. According to several pathology studies, these plaques represent the substrate of coronary thrombosis in about two-thirds of cases; therefore, there has been increasing interest in detecting and treating vulnerable plaques (VPs). Nowadays, VP detection is possible through noninvasive and invasive imaging techniques, such as coronary computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, and near-infrared spectroscopy. Since VPs were shown to be associated with cardiovascular events in observational studies, pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies have been investigated to achieve a regression and/or a passivation of these plaques. In addition to pharmacological therapies, mainly focused on lipid-lowering agents, there has been a recent growing interest in interventional therapies, including coronary scaffolds, stents, and drug-coated balloons. This led to the concept of preventive percutaneous coronary intervention, which, unlike the treatment of culprit lesions in acute coronary syndromes or of ischemia-inducing stenoses, as recommended by guidelines, implies the treatment of angiographically and functionally non-significant lesions based on one or more high-risk plaque characteristics as identified by noninvasive or intracoronary imaging. This article provides an updated review of key concepts in defining and detecting VPs; their prognostic value and available pharmacological and interventional management evidence will also be discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rigattieri et al. (2025) conducted a review in Coronary Vulnerable Plaques. Preventive Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs. Conservative management / Optimal medical therapy was evaluated. Preventive percutaneous coronary intervention of vulnerable coronary plaques may reduce cardiovascular events in high-risk patients, though widespread adoption requires further evidence from ongoing trials.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: