WATCH-PR: Comparison of the Pulse Rate of a WATCH-Type Blood Pressure Monitor with the Pulse Rate of a Conventional Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitor

BACKGROUND: Monitoring pulse rate is fundamental to cardiovascular health management and early detection of rhythm disturbances. While oscillometric blood pressure measurement is well established and validated in clinical practice, its use for pulse rate monitoring, particularly via wrist-worn devices, remains largely unexplored. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates whether a smartwatch that performs oscillometric blood pressure measurements at the wrist can also deliver reliable pulse rate readings using the same method. METHODS: This study compared pulse rates recorded by the Omron HeartGuide smartwatch and conventional ambulatory blood pressure monitors in 50 patients over 24 h. Measurements were taken consecutively, and data were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: The study showed a high ICC of 0.971, indicating excellent agreement between devices. The average pulse rate difference was 1.5 bpm, with the Omron HeartGuide reporting slightly lower rates, especially in patients with atrial fibrillation. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that oscillometric pulse-rate monitoring at the wrist can achieve a high degree of accuracy, comparable to conventional upper-arm devices. Given that oscillometric smartwatches like the Omron HeartGuide are already used for blood pressure monitoring, the findings suggest that they may also be suitable for pulse rate measurement, potentially enhancing their role in telemetric healthcare, but further research is needed, particularly in patients with arrhythmias.