Key result
Treadmill exercise testing elicited higher peak VO2 (21.7 vs 19.6 ml/kg/min; p=0.006) and slower heart rate recovery than bicycle testing in patients with mild heart failure.
Why the study?
Does treadmill exercise testing compared to bicycle testing alter prognostic predictors like peak VO2, VE/VCO2 slope, and HRR in patients with mild heart failure?
Cross-Sectional (n=21)
Does treadmill exercise testing compared to bicycle testing alter prognostic predictors like peak VO2, VE/VCO2 slope, and HRR in patients with mild heart failure?
In patients with mild heart failure, the VE/VCO2 slope is independent of exercise mode (treadmill vs bicycle), whereas peak VO2 and heart rate recovery are mode-dependent.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mode affects peak VO2 and HRR but not VE/VCO2 slope in mild HF; leaves open standardized testing protocols for prognosis.
OBJECTIVES: In patients with heart failure (HF), peak oxygen consumption (peak VO(2)), the relationship between minute ventilation and carbon dioxide production (VE/VCO(2) slope) and heart rate recovery (HRR) are established prognostic predictors. However, treadmill exercise has been shown to elicit higher peak VO(2) values than bicycle exercise. We sought to assess whether the VE/VCO(2) slope and HRR in HF also depend on the exercise mode. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with mild HF on chronic beta-blocker therapy underwent treadmill and bicycle cardiopulmonary exercise testing for measurement of peak VO(2) and the VE/VCO(2) slope. In patients with sinus rhythm (n = 16), HRR at 1 (HRR-1) and 2 min (HRR-2) after exercise termination was assessed. RESULTS: Peak VO(2) was higher during treadmill as compared with bicycle testing (21.7 +/- 4.6 vs. 19.6 +/- 3.4 ml/kg/min; p = 0.006). HRR-1 tended to be slower (15 bpm, interquartile range 8-19, vs. 18 bpm, interquartile range 11-22; p = 0.16), and HRR-2 was significantly slower after treadmill exercise (26 bpm, interquartile range 20-39, vs. 31 bpm, interquartile range 22-41; p = 0.04). In contrast, VE/VCO(2) slope values did not differ between the test modes (32.9 +/- 5.5 vs. 32.3 +/- 5.0; p = 0.56). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to peak VO(2) and HRR, the VE/VCO(2) slope is not affected by the exercise mode in patients with mild HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maeder et al. (2007) conducted a cross-sectional in Mild heart failure (n=21). Treadmill exercise testing vs. Bicycle exercise testing was evaluated on Peak VO2 (ml/kg/min) (p=0.006). Treadmill exercise testing elicited higher peak VO2 (21.7 vs 19.6 ml/kg/min; p=0.006) and slower heart rate recovery than bicycle testing in patients with mild heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: