Key result
Epicardial dual-chamber PPM implantation proves feasible in neonates <3 kg with 0% in-hospital mortality.
Why the study?
Permanent pacing in the young pediatric population can be challenging, particularly in small neonates.
Is surgical placement of dual-chamber permanent pacemakers safe and feasible in neonates weighing <3 kg?
Observational (n=20)
No
Is surgical placement of dual-chamber permanent pacemakers safe and feasible in neonates weighing <3 kg?
Epicardial dual-chamber permanent pacemaker implantation is feasible and safe in neonates weighing under 3 kg, with low rates of complications and no procedure-related mortality.
Supports feasibility in neonates <3 kg; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Purpose: Permanent pacing in the young pediatric population can be challenging, especially in small neonates. We describe our institutional experience with the surgical placement of dual-chamber permanent pacemaker (PPM) systems in neonates weighing <3 kg at the time of implantation. Methods: The Cincinnati Children's Hospital database was used to identify patients who had an epicardial dual-chamber PPM and weighed <3 kg at implantation from 2000 to 2022. Descriptive analyses focused on surgical techniques, postimplant complications, and survival. Results: Twenty patients underwent dual-chamber PPM implantation. Median age at implantation was 6.0 days [3.0-27.0], weight 2.6 kg [2.2-3.0], with the smallest being 1.9 kg. Eight of 20 patients (40%) were premature (<37 weeks), and 2/20 (10%) had Trisomy 21. Most implantations were via median sternotomy [17/20 (85%)]. Most had generator placement in the left upper quadrant [13/20 (65%)] above the posterior fascia and below the rectus muscle. Surgical indication for implantation was congenital heart block [18/20 (90%)], of which 4/18 (22%) were due to maternal lupus. Two patients had PPM secondary to postoperative heart block and 3/20 (15%) had emergent temporary epicardial wires placed before PPM. Pacemaker-related complications occurred in 1/20 (5%) patient on postoperative day 20 related to minor wound dehiscence, without infection, leading to a dual-chamber PPM exchange for a single-chamber device. Another patient (5%) developed a seroma requiring drainage on postoperative day 16. There were no PPM-related in-hospital mortalities or other complications, including late PPM infections. Conclusions: Dual-chamber epicardial PM implantation in neonates <3 kg is feasible with minimal complications and good outcomes based on our reported technique.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmed et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Congenital or postoperative heart block requiring pacing (n=20). Epicardial dual-chamber permanent pacemaker implantation was evaluated on Surgical techniques, postimplant complications, and survival. Epicardial dual-chamber permanent pacemaker implantation in neonates weighing <3 kg was feasible, with no in-hospital mortality, 5% minor wound dehiscence, and 5% seroma.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: