What question did this study set out to answer?

To assess the diagnostic importance of tricuspid stenosis and clarify the diagnostic criteria.

July 1, 1941HeartOpen Access

Tricuspid Stenosis; With Particular Reference to Diagnosis and Prognosis

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Population

Patients with tricuspid valve disease/tricuspid stenosis

Design

Review

Authors

Tricuspid stenosis underdiagnosis may warrant closer valvular assessment; review leaves open standardized diagnostic criteria.

To assess the diagnostic importance of tricuspid stenosis and clarify the diagnostic criteria.
Review of historical cases of tricuspid valve disease in out-patient settings.
Analysis of past literature on tricuspid stenosis diagnosis and prognosis.
Consideration of reported case studies to evaluate diagnostic approaches.
Only 31 out of 250 reported cases were diagnosed before death, indicating significant diagnostic challenges.
Historical perspectives show that misconceptions about the rarity of tricuspid stenosis might hinder its recognition.
Correct diagnoses increased as interest in the condition grew, suggesting that awareness can improve outcomes.

Population

Patients with tricuspid valve disease/tricuspid stenosis

Outcome

Diagnostic criteria and prognosis of tricuspid stenosis

This historical paper emphasizes that tricuspid stenosis is often underdiagnosed and aims to clarify its diagnostic criteria and clinical importance.

Cooke et al. (1941) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark