Key result
Real-world follow-up after atrial switch surgery achieved guideline-recommended timeframes for specialist clinic review in 69% of patients and for cardiac MRI in 18% of patients.
Why the study?
Patients who received atrial switch surgery require lifelong monitoring, but it was unknown how real-world follow-up at a specialist ACHD centre compares to AHA and ESC guideline recommendations.
Does real-world follow-up of patients after atrial switch surgery meet the timeframes recommended by AHA and ESC guidelines?
Observational (n=110)
No
Does real-world follow-up of patients after atrial switch surgery meet the timeframes recommended by AHA and ESC guidelines?
Achieving guideline-recommended follow-up timeframes, particularly for cardiac MRI, is challenging in real-world clinical practice for patients after atrial switch surgery.
Atrial switch surgery, previously the intervention of choice for transposition of the great arteries, has been superseded by the arterial switch operation. The cohorts of patients who received atrial switch operations remain at risk of complications including sudden cardiac death, heart failure, and arrhythmias and require lifelong monitoring. The American Heart Association issued guidance in 2018 about how follow up should be undertaken. We sought to compare the follow up regime suggested by these, and the European Society of Cardiology guidelines to the reality of that achieved in a specialist ACHD centre. Patients under follow up after atrial switch surgery at a Level 1 centre were identified; demographic and clinical data were collected. Timeframes of follow up were compared to those suggested by the guidelines. We identified 110 patients following atrial switch surgery. At the end of the study period 94 patients (median age 41, IQR 11), remained under follow up. There were 16 patients whom had either died or undergone transplantation. Over two-thirds (65,69%) received a specialist clinic review within the recommended timeframe. Almost one fifth, 17 patients (18%) underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging within the recommended timeframe. Our results show that achieving the recommended timeframes for patient follow up following atrial switch surgery is challenging in real life clinical practice. Future studies are needed to provide evidence for optimal follow up intervals that result in improvements in patient outcomes, given the cost and resource implications of these enhanced follow up regimes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Williams et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Transposition of the great arteries post-atrial switch surgery (n=110). Real-world clinical follow-up vs. Guideline-recommended follow-up timeframes was evaluated on Receipt of specialist clinic review within the recommended timeframe. Real-world follow-up after atrial switch surgery achieved guideline-recommended timeframes for specialist clinic review in 69% of patients and for cardiac MRI in 18% of patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: