In this paper, we optimize the stack of a 90-nm CMOS-friendly <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">W Al₂ O₃ Cu</tex></formula> conductive-bridging random access memory cell integrated in the one-transistor/one-resistor configuration. We show that the excellent Cu buffering properties of a TiW layer inserted at the <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">Al₂ O₃ Cu</tex></formula> interface make it possible, on one hand, to ensure cell integrity after back-end-of-line processing at 400 <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex Notation="TeX">∘ C</tex></formula> and, on the other, to obtain excellent memory performances. After optimization of the <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">Al₂ O₃</tex></formula> layer thickness, the cell exhibits highly controlled set and reset operations, a large memory window, fast pulse programming (10 ns) at low voltage <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">(< 3~ V)</tex></formula> , and low-current (10 <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">μ A</tex></formula> ), and multilevel operation. Finally, <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">10⁶</tex></formula> cycles of write endurance lifetime with up to a three-decade memory window is demonstrated, and state stability is assessed up to 125 <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">∘ C</tex></formula> .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Belmonte et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: