Key result
Biventricular pacing in a rabbit model of myocardial infarction recovered ERG protein levels compared to no pacing or right ventricular pacing (P=0.07).
Why the study?
Does biventricular pacing improve ERG protein levels in a rabbit model of myocardial infarction?
Does biventricular pacing improve ERG protein levels in a rabbit model of myocardial infarction?
Biventricular pacing restores ERG protein levels in a rabbit model of myocardial infarction, suggesting a posttranscriptional mechanism that may contribute to the benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Background: Improved clinical and echocardiographic parameters have been documented with biventricular (BIV) pacing in patients after myocardial infarction (MI). We investigated the changes in gene expression in cardiac tissue with BIV pacing, using a rabbit model of MI. Method: New Zealand White rabbits were divided into four groups: sham-operated controls, MI with no pacing, MI with right ventricle (RV) pacing (MI + RV), and MI with BIV pacing (MI + BIV). Pacing was initiated 1–2 weeks after the coronary ligation. At 5 weeks, the hearts were excised. The tissue extracted from the left ventricle (LV) and RV underwent analysis for protein and messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) levels. Results: The ether-a-go-go-related gene (ERG) protein levels recovered from the base of the LV away from the MI area were two- to threefold lower in the MI and the MI + RV compared with the MI + BIV groups ( P = 0.07). The ERG protein levels were similar between the MI + BIV and the control groups. However, the RNA levels were comparable between the four study groups, suggesting that a posttranscriptional mechanism accounted for the difference in protein levels. Conclusion: In this rabbit model of MI, we demonstrated a recovery in ERG protein levels with BIV pacing, after MI. This recovery may underlie some of the benefits seen with BIV pacing in ischemic cardiomyopathy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saba et al. (2013) studied Myocardial infarction. Biventricular (BIV) pacing vs. Sham-operated controls, MI with no pacing, and MI with right ventricle (RV) pacing was evaluated on ERG protein and mRNA levels in cardiac tissue (p=0.07). Biventricular pacing in a rabbit model of myocardial infarction recovered ERG protein levels compared to no pacing or right ventricular pacing (P=0.07).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: