Key result
Left ventricular and biventricular pacing diminished the marked left ventricular dyssynchrony induced by right ventricular pacing in normal rats, but these effects were markedly attenuated in rats with extensive myocardial infarction.
Why the study?
Does LV or BIV pacing improve left ventricular synchronization compared to RV pacing in normal and infarcted rat myocardium?
Does LV or BIV pacing improve left ventricular synchronization compared to RV pacing in normal and infarcted rat myocardium?
This study establishes a conscious rat model for double-site epicardial pacing, demonstrating that while LV and BIV pacing improve dyssynchrony in normal hearts compared to RV pacing, these benefits are attenuated in the presence of extensive myocardial infarction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
LV/BiV pacing benefits attenuated by extensive MI in rats; hypothesis-generating for resynchronization strategies in human ischemic cardiomyopathy.
BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) pacing generates regional disparities in electrical activation and mechanical function (ventricular dyssynchrony). In contrast, left ventricular (LV) or biventricular (BIV) pacing can improve cardiac efficiency in the setting of ventricular dyssynchrony, constituting the rationale for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Animal models of ventricular dyssynchrony and CRT currently relay on large mammals which are expensive and not readily available to most researchers. We developed a methodology for double-site epicardial pacing in conscious rats. Here, following post-operative recovery, we compared the effects of various pacing modes on LV dyssynchrony in normal rats and in rats with ischemic cardiomyopathy. METHODS: Two bipolar electrodes were implanted in rats as follows: Group A (n = 6) right atrial (RA) and RV sites; Group B (n = 7) RV and LV sites; Group C (n = 8) as in group B in combination with left coronary artery ligation. Electrodes were exteriorized through the back. Following post-operative recovery, two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography was performed during pacing through the different electrodes. Segmental systolic circumferential strain (Ecc) was used to evaluate LV dyssynchrony. RESULTS: In normal rats, RV pacing induced marked LV dyssynchrony compared to RA pacing or sinus rhythm, as measured by the standard deviation (SD) of segmental time to peak Ecc, SD of peak Ecc, and the average delay between opposing ventricular segments. LV pacing and, to a greater extend BIV pacing diminished the LV dyssynchrony compared to RV pacing. In rats with extensive MI, the effects of LV and BIV pacing were markedly attenuated, and the response of individual animals was variable. CONCLUSIONS: Rodent cardiac pacing mimics important features seen in humans. This model may be developed as a simple new tool to study the pathophysiology of ventricular dyssynchrony and CRT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mor et al. (2014) studied Normal and Infarcted Myocardium (Ischemic Cardiomyopathy) (n=21). Left ventricular (LV) and biventricular (BIV) pacing vs. Right ventricular (RV) pacing, right atrial (RA) pacing, or sinus rhythm was evaluated on Left ventricular dyssynchrony evaluated by segmental systolic circumferential strain (Ecc). Left ventricular and biventricular pacing diminished the marked left ventricular dyssynchrony induced by right ventricular pacing in normal rats, but these effects were markedly attenuated in rats with extensive myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: