Key result
Referral to cardiac rehabilitation was associated with a lower risk of acute all-cause readmission (OR 0.92) and all-cause mortality (OR 0.65) at 1 year compared to no referral.
Why the study?
Temporal trends and factors linked to cardiac rehabilitation referral, and its association with readmission and mortality risk in heart failure, needed examination.
Does referral to exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation reduce acute all-cause hospital readmission and mortality in adult patients with incident heart failure?
Cohort (n=33,257)
Yes
Does referral to exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation reduce acute all-cause hospital readmission and mortality in adult patients with incident heart failure?
Odds Ratio: 0.92 (95% CI 0.87–0.97)
Referral to cardiac rehabilitation in incident heart failure patients is associated with significantly lower risks of 1-year all-cause readmission and mortality, though referral rates remain suboptimal and disparities exist.
May support CR referral consideration in incident HF; leaves open RCT confirmation of causality and uptake strategies.
AIMS: To examine the temporal trends and factors associated with national cardiac rehabilitation (CR) referral and compare the risk of hospital readmission and mortality in those referred for CR versus no referral. METHODS AND RESULTS: This cohort study includes all adult patients alive 120 days from incident heart failure (HF) identified by the Danish Heart Failure Registry (n = 33 257) between 2010 and 2018. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the association between CR referral and patient factors and acute all-cause hospital readmission and mortality at 1 year following HF admission. Overall, 46.7% of HF patients were referred to CR, increasing from 31.7% in 2010 to 52.2% in 2018. Several factors were associated with lower odds of CR referral: male sex [odds ratio (OR): 0.85; 95% confidence interval: 0.80-0.89], older age, unemployment, retirement, living alone, non-Danish ethnic origin, low educational level, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV vs. I (OR: 0.75; 0.60-0.95), left ventricular ejection fraction >40%, and comorbidity (stroke, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation/flutter, and diabetes). Myocardial infarction, arthritis, coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous coronary intervention, valvular surgery, NYHA class II, and use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were associated with higher odds of CR referral. CR referral was associated with lower risk of acute all-cause readmission (OR: 0.92; 0.87-0.97) and all-cause mortality (OR: 0.65; 0.58-0.72). CONCLUSION: Although increased over time, only one in two HF patients in Denmark were referred to CR in 2018. Strategies are needed to reduce referral disparities, focusing on subgroups of patients at highest risk of non-referral.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thygesen et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=33,257). Cardiac rehabilitation referral vs. No referral was evaluated on Acute all-cause readmission (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87-0.97). Referral to cardiac rehabilitation was associated with a lower risk of acute all-cause readmission (OR 0.92) and all-cause mortality (OR 0.65) at 1 year compared to no referral.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: