Key result
Catheter ablation effectively eliminated symptomatic, frequent, and drug-refractory PACs, with similar freedom from recurrence in patients without AF and with PAC-induced AF.
Why the study?
What are the electrophysiological differences between PACs with and without AF induction, and does catheter ablation effectively eliminate symptomatic, frequent, and drug-refractory PACs?
Cohort (n=70)
What are the electrophysiological differences between PACs with and without AF induction, and does catheter ablation effectively eliminate symptomatic, frequent, and drug-refractory PACs?
Catheter ablation is highly effective for eliminating symptomatic, drug-refractory PACs, which exhibit distinct electrophysiological features such as longer coupling intervals compared to PACs that induce AF.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support ablation for symptomatic refractory PACs with or without AF induction; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
AIMS: Frequent premature atrial contractions (PACs) are associated with increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF), stroke, and death. This study aimed to explore the electrophysiological features of PACs with and without inducing AF and to evaluate the effectiveness of catheter ablation for PACs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-five consecutive patients with symptomatic, frequent, and drug-refractory PACs in the absence of AF (group A) and 35 patients with PACs-induced AF (group B) were enrolled. Coupling intervals (CoIs) of PACs were compared. Premature atrial contractions were mapped by the point-by-point and/or circular mapping technique. Focal ablation or pulmonary vein/superior vena cava isolation was applied as appropriate. A total of 35 ectopic foci were identified in group A. The majority of them were at pulmonary vein (PV) (n = 7), crista terminalis (n = 6), and para-Hisian area (n = 6). In group B, ectopic foci were in left-sided PVs in 21 patients, in right-sided PVs in 13 patients, and in SVC in 1 patient. There was significant difference in CoIs of PACs triggering AF and those from PVs and non-PV areas but without causing AF (362.8 ± 23.0 ms vs. 470.6 ± 60.1 ms vs. 515.6 ± 77.2 ms, P< 0.001). Premature atrial contractions were abolished in 32 of 35 patients from group A and in all patients from group B. At the end of follow-up, 29 patients in group A and 28 patients in group B were free of recurrence (off antiarrhythmic drugs) after the initial ablation (P =0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Frequent PACs in the absence of AF were characterized as having their predilection sites and longer CoIs than those inducing AF. Catheter ablation was effective to eliminate symptomatic, frequent, and drug-refractory PACs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Symptomatic frequent premature atrial contractions (n=70). Catheter ablation for PACs without AF vs. Catheter ablation for PAC-induced AF was evaluated on Freedom from recurrence (off antiarrhythmic drugs) after the initial ablation (p=0.97). Catheter ablation effectively eliminated symptomatic, frequent, and drug-refractory PACs, with similar freedom from recurrence in patients without AF and with PAC-induced AF.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: