Why the study?
Do direct-current countershocks affect regional myocardial contractility and perfusion in dogs?
Do direct-current countershocks affect regional myocardial contractility and perfusion in dogs?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High-energy epicardial shocks cause functional myocardial damage, supporting the use of low initial energies (10-20 J) during open-chest defibrillation, whereas high-energy transthoracic shocks do not impair contraction or perfusion.
Very high energy electrical countershocks can cause morphologic damage to the myocardium. In this study we searched for functional correlates of these shock-induced morphologic changes. We used ultrasonic sonomicrometers to measure myocardial contractility and radiolabeled microspheres to assess perfusion. Acute and chronic experiments were conducted in 45 dogs, assessing the effect of both direct (epicardial) and transthoracic shocks on beating and fibrillating hearts. High-energy or rapidly repeated epicardial shocks caused subepicardial contraction abnormalities. This indicates that electrical current delivered to the myocardium in sufficiently high amounts and concentration can cause functional damage. Thus, in open-chest defibrillation during cardiac surgery, low energies (10-20 J) should be used initially and higher energies resorted to only if lower-energy shocks fail. However, single and multiple transthoracic shocks up to 460 J delivered energy caused no detectable contraction abnormalities. Myocardial perfusion did not fall after shocks. Thus, high-energy transthoracic shocks may have no deleterious effects on the contraction and perfusion of normal myocardium.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kerber et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: