Key result
Visual assessment of fetal heart rate tracings is unreliable due to low agreement rates, and knowledge of clinical information introduces subjectivity that negatively impacts reliability.
Why the study?
Does knowledge of perinatal outcome bias the visual analysis and reliability of antepartum fetal heart rate tracings?
Population
100 antepartum fetal heart rate tracings
Comparison
Visual analysis of fetal heart rate tracings… vs Visual analysis of fetal heart rate tracings…
Design
Other, Observers were either blinded or unblinded to fictitious perinatal…
Authors
Loading...
May bias clinical FHR interpretation; leaves open need for objective assessment tools.
Observational (n=100)
Does knowledge of perinatal outcome bias the visual analysis and reliability of antepartum fetal heart rate tracings?
Visual assessment of fetal heart rate tracings has low inter- and intra-observer agreement, which is further worsened by knowledge of clinical outcomes.
Figueras et al. (2005) conducted an observational in Antepartum fetal heart rate tracings (n=100). Knowledge of fictitious perinatal outcome vs. No knowledge of perinatal outcome (unbiased observers) was evaluated on Inter- and intra-observer agreement (proportion of agreement and intra-class correlation coefficient). Visual assessment of fetal heart rate tracings is unreliable due to low agreement rates, and knowledge of clinical information introduces subjectivity that negatively impacts reliability.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: