Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective analysis compares outcomes of autologous and allogeneic HSCT in younger AML patients in first complete remission, suggesting similar overall survival.
Optimal therapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR-1) remains the subject of debate: with the possibilities of chemotherapy alone, autologous (auto) or allogeneic (allo) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We undertook a retrospective analysis of AML patients aged below 46 years and in CR-1, who had undergone auto- or allo-HSCT in our institution, to determine the factors associated with a better outcome. Between September 1985 and April 2003, 81 patients underwent autologous (n = 29) or allogeneic (n = 52) HSCT in CR-1. With a median follow-up of 10 years, the probability of 15-year overall survival (OS) was 51%[95% confidence interval (CI) = 32 - 70%] for auto-HSCT vs. 55% (95% CI = 42 - 69) for allo-HSCT, respectively (P = 0.92). The cumulative incidence of relapse at 3 years was 49% (95% CI = 30 - 67) (auto) vs. 21% (95% CI = 10 - 30) (allo), respectively. Non-relapse-related mortality at 3 years was 5% (95% CI = 0 - 14) (auto) vs. 17% (95% CI = 7 - 28) (allo), respectively. This retrospective analysis confirmed that auto- and allo-HSCT led to similar OS. The significantly lower incidence of relapse amongst allograft recipients was balanced by an increased incidence of death in CR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loh et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: