Key result
Systolic hypertension and non-valvular AF drive independently increased risk of incident stroke.
This historical review highlights the foundational role of the Framingham Heart Study in establishing modern stroke prevention strategies focused on hypertension and atrial fibrillation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports targeting midlife hypertension and AF for stroke prevention; leaves open validation in contemporary diverse cohorts.
In the present historical review, we highlight several articles outlining contributions of the Framingham Heart Study over the span of nearly seven decades to our understanding of the epidemiology of blood pressure (BP), atrial fibrillation and genetic factors as they relate to cerebrovascular disease. In 1970, Framingham investigators led by William Kannel, explored the epidemiological relations of BP and its various components to risk of ischemic stroke as well as hemorrhage, and noted the greater impact of hypertension to risk of stroke compared to other cardiovascular outcomes. Framingham investigators changed the prevalent concepts in terms of the contribution of BP components to stroke risk; i.e. they showed systolic pressure to be no less important a component for stroke risk than the diastolic or mean arterial pressures. In addition, they challenged the notion that hypertension was a normal consequence of increasing age, as connoted by the term "essential" hypertension. They also refuted the idea that blood pressure elevation in the elderly is innocuous by demonstrating that increased stroke risk persisted in advanced age in hypertensive persons. Thirty years later, the Framingham Study attained long term follow up of an entire generation of participants with excellent retention to follow-up, thus providing an opportunity to study hypertension and risk of stroke in a general population sample. Framingham investigators examined the impact of various BP components over a 50-year follow-up in normotensive and untreated hypertensive individuals as regards stroke risk, and showed the long term importance of antecedent (midlife) hypertension in future stroke risk . Similarly by calling attention to the importance of chronic non-valvular atrial fibrillation as a contributor to stroke, particularly in the elderly, FHS investigators confirmed the clinical observations of the founder of stroke neurology, C. Miller Fisher, M.D., who had made the clinical and pathological association of AF to stroke. Lastly, in the dawn of the era of individualized preventive medicine, FHS is participating in the effort to further our understanding of the role of genetic factors to stroke incidence. The contributions of the Framingham Heart Study have been many and have shaped our understanding of the relation of BP, AF and other risk factors to stroke risk, thereby setting the stage for clinical trials which demonstrated how control of these risk contributors could prevent stroke and enable stroke prevention. FHS investigators are collaborating with other geneticists and epidemiologists internationally to elucidate the role of genetic factors and stroke susceptibility, which is likely continue to shape the practice of preventive cardiovascular medicine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Romero et al. (2013) conducted a review in Stroke, Hypertension, and Atrial Fibrillation. Blood pressure, atrial fibrillation, and genetic risk factors was evaluated. The Framingham Heart Study demonstrated that systolic blood pressure, antecedent midlife hypertension, and non-valvular atrial fibrillation are major independent risk factors for incident stroke.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: