A chest-conformable wireless e-tattoo accurately measured systolic time intervals (error = -0.44 ± 8.74 ms) compared to gold-standard instruments in five human subjects.
Does a wireless electro-mechanical e-tattoo accurately measure systolic time intervals compared to gold-standard instruments in human subjects?
A novel wireless, chest-conformable e-tattoo accurately measures systolic time intervals, enabling unobtrusive 24-hour ambulatory cardiac monitoring.
Mean Difference: -0.44
Abstract Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death globally. Noninvasive, accurate, and continuous cardiovascular monitoring can enable the preemptive detection of heart diseases and timely intervention to prevent serious cardiac complications. However, unobtrusive, ambulatory, and comprehensive cardiac monitoring is still a challenge as conventional electronics are rigid, heavy, or consume too much power for long‐term measurement. This work presents a thin (200 µm), stretchable (20%), lightweight (2.5 g), wireless, and low‐power (<3 mW) cardiac monitoring device that conforms to the human chest like a temporary tattoo sticker, correspondingly known as an e‐tattoo. This chest e‐tattoo features dual‐mode electro‐mechanical sensing—bio‐electric cardiac signals via electrocardiography and mechanical cardiac rhythm via seismocardiography. A unique peripheral synchronization strategy between the two sensors enables the measurement of systolic time intervals like the pre‐ejection period and the left ventricular ejection time with high accuracy (error = −0.44 ± 8.74 ms) while consuming very low power. The e‐tattoo is validated against clinically approved gold‐standard instruments on five human subjects. The good wearability and low power consumption of this e‐tattoo permit 24‐h continuous ambulatory monitoring.
Bhattacharya et al. (Tue,) reported a other. Chest-conformable, wireless electro-mechanical e-tattoo vs. Clinically approved gold-standard instruments was evaluated on Measurement of systolic time intervals (pre-ejection period and left ventricular ejection time) (error = -0.44 ± 8.74 ms). A chest-conformable wireless e-tattoo accurately measured systolic time intervals (error = -0.44 ± 8.74 ms) compared to gold-standard instruments in five human subjects.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: