Key result
The Accutension smartphone-based blood pressure kit demonstrated high agreement with a mercury sphygmomanometer for systolic (ICC 0.993) and diastolic (ICC 0.987) measurements.
Why the study?
Does the Accutension smartphone-based auscultatory blood pressure kit provide accurate readings compared to a traditional mercury sphygmomanometer in human subjects?
Cross-Sectional (n=32)
Does the Accutension smartphone-based auscultatory blood pressure kit provide accurate readings compared to a traditional mercury sphygmomanometer in human subjects?
The Accutension smartphone-based blood pressure kit demonstrates high accuracy and agreement with traditional mercury sphygmomanometers, offering a reliable mobile health tool for hypertension management.
May support smartphone BP monitoring in hypertension; leaves open validation in larger, diverse cohorts before practice change.
The widely used oscillometric automated blood pressure (BP) monitor was continuously questioned on its accuracy. A novel BP kit named Accutension which adopted Korotkoff auscultation method was then devised. Accutension worked with a miniature microphone, a pressure sensor, and a smartphone. The BP values were automatically displayed on the smartphone screen through the installed App. Data recorded in the phone could be played back and reconfirmed after measurement. They could also be uploaded and saved to the iCloud. The accuracy and consistency of this novel electronic auscultatory sphygmomanometer was preliminarily verified here. Thirty-two subjects were included and 82 qualified readings were obtained. The mean differences ± SD for systolic and diastolic BP readings between Accutension and mercury sphygmomanometer were 0.87 ± 2.86 and -0.94 ± 2.93 mm Hg. Agreements between Accutension and mercury sphygmomanometer were highly significant for systolic (ICC = 0.993, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.989-0.995) and diastolic (ICC = 0.987, 95% CI: 0.979-0.991). In conclusion, Accutension worked accurately based on our pilot study data. The difference was acceptable. ICC and Bland-Altman plot charts showed good agreements with manual measurements. Systolic readings of Accutension were slightly higher than those of manual measurement, while diastolic readings were slightly lower. One possible reason was that Accutension captured the first and the last korotkoff sound more sensitively than human ear during manual measurement and avoided sound missing, so that it might be more accurate than traditional mercury sphygmomanometer. By documenting and analyzing of variant tendency of BP values, Accutension helps management of hypertension and therefore contributes to the mobile heath service.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension (n=32). Accutension blood pressure kit vs. Mercury sphygmomanometer was evaluated on Agreement in systolic blood pressure (ICC 0.993, 95% CI 0.989-0.995). The Accutension smartphone-based blood pressure kit demonstrated high agreement with a mercury sphygmomanometer for systolic (ICC 0.993) and diastolic (ICC 0.987) measurements.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: