Why the study?
Does cerebral vasomotor responsiveness correlate with cognitive performance in patients with multi-infarct dementia compared to Alzheimer's dementia and healthy volunteers?
Does cerebral vasomotor responsiveness correlate with cognitive performance in patients with multi-infarct dementia compared to Alzheimer's dementia and healthy volunteers?
Loss of cerebral vasomotor responsiveness correlates with cognitive impairment in multi-infarct dementia, providing a biologic marker to differentiate it from Alzheimer's dementia.
Supports vasomotor responsiveness as potential differentiator in dementia subtypes; hypothesis-generating, should not yet change practice.
Cerebral blood flow (CBF) was measured by the 133Xe inhalation method in patients with multi-infarct dementia (MID, N = 26), Alzheimer's dementia (AD, N = 19), and among age-matched, neurologically normal, healthy volunteers (N = 26). Cognitive performance was assessed in all subjects using the Cognitive Capacity Screening Examination (CCSE). Cerebral vasomotor responses were calculated from differences in values of mean hemispheric gray matter blood flow (Delta CBF) measured during inhalation of 100% oxygen (hyperoxia) compared with CBF measured while breathing room air. Significant correlations were found between CCSE performance and vasomotor responsiveness in patients with MID (P less than .01), but not in patients with AD or in neurologically normal volunteers. Loss of vasomotor responsiveness is an indicator of cerebrovascular disease with rigidity and/or loss of reactivity of cerebral vessels, which impairs cerebrovascular responses to situational demands and predisposes to cerebral ischemia. Loss of cerebral vasomotor responsiveness among MID patients, which is a biologic marker of cerebrovascular disease, provides confirmatory evidence of the vascular etiology of MID and assists in separating MID from AD patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Judd et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: