Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
February 1, 1978Annals of Internal Medicine

Myocardial Infarction: Unit Care or Home Care?

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Design

Editorial

Authors

OPOsler L. PetersonWorcester Polytechnic Institute

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Slow adoption of proven MI therapies persists; leaves open optimal strategies to accelerate evidence uptake.

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Osler L. Peterson (1978) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20e98bdc4e16663149d8a4https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-88-2-259
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1BENEFITS OBTAINED BY THE INTRODUCTION OF A CORONARY‐CARE UNIT1971 · 61 citations
  2. 2End Results, Cost and Productivity of Coronary-Care Units1973 · 132 citations
  3. 3Acute Myocardial Infarction: Home and Hospital Treatment1971 · 210 citations
  4. 4Inputs into Coronary Care During 30 Years1974 · 59 citations
  5. 5Myocardial infarction: a comparison between home and hospital care for patients.1976 · 203 citations