Key result
His bundle pacing successfully captured the His bundle in 81% of patients requiring a pacemaker post-TAVR, correcting LBBB in 69% and significantly narrowing QRS duration (P=0.005).
Why the study?
Conduction disorders requiring permanent pacemaker implantation occur frequently after TAVR, and the feasibility and safety of His bundle pacing to correct TAVR-induced LBBB needed exploration.
Is His-bundle pacing feasible for correcting TAVR-induced LBBB in patients requiring a permanent pacemaker?
Observational (n=16)
Yes
Is His-bundle pacing feasible for correcting TAVR-induced LBBB in patients requiring a permanent pacemaker?
His-bundle pacing is a feasible approach to correct TAVR-induced LBBB in patients requiring permanent pacemakers, providing stable pacing thresholds and significant QRS narrowing.
Suggests His-bundle pacing feasibility post-TAVR; hypothesis-generating pending randomized outcome data.
BACKGROUND: Conduction disorders requiring permanent pacemaker implantation occur frequently after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). This multicenter study explored the feasibility and safety of His bundle pacing (HBP) in TAVR patients with a pacemaker indication to correct a TAVR-induced left bundle branch block (LBBB). METHODS: Patients qualifying for a permanent pacemaker implant after TAVR were planned for HBP implant. HBP was performed using the Select Secure (3830; Medtronic) pacing lead, delivered through a fixed curve or deflectable sheath (C315HIS or C304; Medtronic). Successful HBP was defined as selective or nonselective HBP, irrespective of LBB recruitment. Successful LBBB correction was defined as selective or nonselective HBP resulting in paced QRS morphology similar to pre-TAVR QRS and paced QRS duration (QRSd) less than 120 milliseconds with thresholds less than 3.0 V at 1.0-millisecond pulse width. RESULTS: The study enrolled 16 patients requiring a permanent pacemaker after TAVR (age 85 ± 4 years, 31% female, all LBBB; QRSd: 161 ± 14 milliseconds). Capture of the His bundle was achieved in 13 of 16 (81%) patients. HBP with LBBB correction was achieved in 11 of 16 (69%) and QRSd narrowed from 162 ± 14 to 99 ± 13 milliseconds and 134 ± 7 milliseconds during S-HBP and NS-HBP, respectively (P = .005). At implantation, mean threshold for LBBB correction was 1.9 ± 1.1 V at 1.0 millisecond. Thresholds remained stable at 11 ± 4 months follow-up (1.8 ± 0.9 V at 1.0 millisecond, P = .231 for comparison with implant thresholds). During HBP implant, one temporary complete atrioventricular block occurred. CONCLUSION: Permanent HBP is feasible in the majority of patients with TAVR requiring a permanent pacemaker with the potential to correct a TAVR-induced LBBB with acceptable pacing thresholds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pooter et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Conduction disorders requiring permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVR (n=16). His bundle pacing (HBP) was evaluated on Capture of the His bundle. His bundle pacing successfully captured the His bundle in 81% of patients requiring a pacemaker post-TAVR, correcting LBBB in 69% and significantly narrowing QRS duration (P=0.005).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: