Why the study?
Does determination of neutralizing specific IgM antibody provide a sensitive and rapid test for the diagnosis of echovirus 33 infection?
Does determination of neutralizing specific IgM antibody provide a sensitive and rapid test for the diagnosis of echovirus 33 infection?
Determination of neutralizing specific IgM antibody is a sensitive and rapid test for diagnosing enterovirus infections, particularly in young people.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Neutralizing IgM may support rapid EV33 diagnosis in select patients; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
In 1982, we isolated 20 strains of echovirus type 33 (EV33) from 18 patients. We studied the humoral response to EV33 of 2,437 subjects from whom at least one serum was available during the same year. In 388 subjects with the neutralizing antibody level at 64 or more, we assayed the EV33 IgM antibodies by seroneutralization test after fractionation of sera by ion exchange chromatography. One hundred ninety-five subjects (8.0%) had a high titre (greater than or equal to 32) of EV33 IgM antibodies, which was considered as evidence of recent infection. The EV33-positive IgM fractions were assayed against five other enteroviruses. Sixty percent of the IgM fractions did not cross-react with any of the five serotypes, 8.7% cross-reacted with at least one serotype but with predominant EV33 IgM response, and 31.3% had an equivalent or greater amount of non-EV33 IgM antibodies; the type specificity of the assay was directly related to the age of the subjects. These findings suggest that determination of neutralizing specific IgM antibody is a sensitive and rapid test for the diagnosis of enterovirus infections, especially in young people.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pozzetto et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: