Key result
STEMI patients with a low risk score (≤5 points) on a new biomarker-based predictive model had a lower risk of 6-month combined clinical outcomes compared to those with a high risk score.
Why the study?
To determine the discriminative potency of a score to prognosticate poor clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI.
Does a new biomarker-based predictive model improve the prediction of 6-month combined clinical outcomes in acute STEMI patients compared to conventional risk models?
Cohort (n=177)
No
Does a new biomarker-based predictive model improve the prediction of 6-month combined clinical outcomes in acute STEMI patients compared to conventional risk models?
A novel predictive model incorporating genetic polymorphisms and circulating biomarkers (sST2, VEGF, MIF) improves risk stratification for 6-month MACE in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid STEMI risk stratification post-PCI; hypothesis-generating until prospectively validated against conventional models.
Aim: To determine the discriminative potency of score to prognosticate poor clinical outcomes in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) patients. Methods: From the entire population of STEMI (n=268), we enrolled 177 individuals with acute STEMI who underwent complete revascularization with primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI). Clinical assessment, echocardiography, Doppler, and biomarkers’ measure were performed at baseline. Results: Combined endpoint (Major Cardiovascular Events - MACEs [composite of cardiovascular death, recurrent myocardial infarction, newly diagnosed Heart Failure] and hospitalization) was determined in 75 patients with acute STEMI population (40.6%). Newly onset heart failure (HF) was reported in 46 patients (26.0%), Cardiovascular (CV) death occurred in 12 patients (6.8%), MACEs were determined in 58 patients (32.8%), and recurrent hospitalization due to CV reasons was found in 17 (9.6%). The conventional risk predictive models were engineered by a combination of TIMI risk score +acute HF Killip class ≥ II + the levels of NT-pro brain natriuretic peptide > 300 pg / mL and troponin >0.05 ng/mL. We developed a new predictive model based on the presentation of T786С genotype of endothelial NO syntase gene (rs 2070744), А1166С in angiotensin-ІІ receptor-1 gene (rs5186) and serum levels of soluble suppressor tumorigenicity ≥35 pg/mL, vascular endothelial growth factor ≤172 pg/mL and macrophage inhibitory factor ≥2792.7 pg/mL. STEMI patients who had >5 score points demonstrated significantly worse prognosis than those who had ≤5 score points. Conclusion: Here we have reported that a new original predictive model is better than a conventional model in discriminative ability to predict combined clinical outcome in STEMI patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Petyunina et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) (n=177). Low risk score (≤5 points) on a new biomarker-based predictive model vs. High risk score (>5 points) was evaluated on 6-month combined clinical outcome (CV death, recurrent MI, newly diagnosed HF, and hospitalization) (HR 0.4253, 95% CI 0.1952-0.9264, p=0.0314). STEMI patients with a low risk score (≤5 points) on a new biomarker-based predictive model had a lower risk of 6-month combined clinical outcomes compared to those with a high risk score.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: