Why the study?
Does roentgen videodensitometry accurately measure left ventricular ejection fraction compared to conventional angiographic volume techniques in humans?
Does roentgen videodensitometry accurately measure left ventricular ejection fraction compared to conventional angiographic volume techniques in humans?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Roentgen videodensitometry provides a valid, geometry-independent method for measuring left ventricular ejection fraction with several advantages over conventional angiographic volume techniques.
This report describes a new method based on roentgen videodensitometry for the measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction in man. The net forward ejection fraction (NFEF) is calculated directly from the formula NFEF=1-exp(-.693/N), where N is the number of cardiac cycles necessary for half of the injected contrast material to be washed out of the left ventricle. The derivation of this formula is presented, and the technique is validated by comparison with washout curves from a Lucite model of the heart and with simultaneous angiographically determined left ventricular ejection fractions in man. The videodensitometry technique offers the following advantages over the conventional volume technique: (1) only a small amount of contrast material is required; (2) ectopic beats are uncommon during the washout phase when measurements are made; (3) the ejection fraction measured is an average of several cardiac cycles; and (4) dependence upon operator interpretation is minimized. Furthermore, given adequate mixing within the chamber, NFEF should be independent of ventricular geometry. Thus, NFEF of the unusually shaped left ventricle can be readily determined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schuette et al. (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: