Key result
A water-selective inversion pulse for contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI yielded higher subjective image scores compared to a conventional TSE sequence.
Why the study?
Does a water-selective inversion pulse improve fat visualization in inversion recovery-based contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI compared to conventional TSE?
Does a water-selective inversion pulse improve fat visualization in inversion recovery-based contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI compared to conventional TSE?
A water-selective inversion pulse improves the simultaneous visualization of water and fat in contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI compared to conventional TSE sequences.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support better fat-water visualization in cardiac MRI; leaves open prospective validation of diagnostic utility.
PURPOSE: To develop an improved chemical shift-based water-fat separation sequence using a water-selective inversion pulse for inversion recovery 3D contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In inversion recovery sequences the fat signal is substantially reduced due to the application of a nonselective inversion pulse. Therefore, for simultaneous visualization of water, fat, and myocardial enhancement in inversion recovery-based sequences such as late gadolinium enhancement imaging, two separate scans are used. To overcome this, the nonselective inversion pulse is replaced with a water-selective inversion pulse. Imaging was performed in phantoms, nine healthy subjects, and nine patients with suspected arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy plus one patient for tumor/mass imaging. In patients, images with conventional turbo-spin echo (TSE) with and without fat saturation were acquired prior to contrast injection for fat assessment. Subjective image scores (1 = poor, 4 = excellent) were used for image assessment. RESULTS: Phantom experiments showed a fat signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) increase between 1.7 to 5.9 times for inversion times of 150 and 300 msec, respectively. The water-selective inversion pulse retains the fat signal in contrast-enhanced cardiac MR, allowing improved visualization of fat in the water-fat separated images of healthy subjects with a score of 3.7 ± 0.6. Patient images acquired with the proposed sequence were scored higher when compared with a TSE sequence (3.5 ± 0.7 vs. 2.2 ± 0.5, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The water-selective inversion pulse retains the fat signal in inversion recovery-based contrast-enhanced cardiac MR, allowing simultaneous visualization of water and fat.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Havla et al. (2012) studied Suspected arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy or tumor/mass (n=19). Water-selective inversion pulse vs. Conventional turbo-spin echo (TSE) was evaluated on Subjective image scores (1 = poor, 4 = excellent) (p=< 0.05). A water-selective inversion pulse for contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI yielded higher subjective image scores compared to a conventional TSE sequence.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: