Why the study?
Does maximal longitudinal relaxation velocity measured by M-mode echocardiography detect diastolic dysfunction in patients after acute myocardial infarction compared to healthy controls?
Does maximal longitudinal relaxation velocity measured by M-mode echocardiography detect diastolic dysfunction in patients after acute myocardial infarction compared to healthy controls?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Maximal longitudinal relaxation velocity measured by M-mode echocardiography is a more sensitive indicator of diastolic dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction than standard E/A ratio or deceleration time.
Diastolic left ventricular function is usually described using Doppler recording of the early to atrial (E/A) ratio. However, because of pseudonormalization in patients with moderately impaired diastolic function, the E/A ratio does not allow a meaningful comparison between a group of patients with varying degrees of dysfunction, e.g. after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and a group of healthy control subjects. In this study, diastolic function was assessed using the E/A ratio, deceleration time of early mitral inflow and maximal longitudinal relaxation velocity. The relaxation velocity was measured using echocardiographic M-mode recording of mitral annulus motion. Mitral annulus motion was recorded in four- and two-chamber views. Relaxation velocities were measured in the septal, lateral, anterior and posterior parts of the mitral annulus and the mean value (RVm) was calculated. Twenty-two consecutive patients were investigated 3-21 days after first transmural AMI. Twenty-two healthy subjects of similar age served as a control group. The group of patients with AMI had an RVm of 40.9 +/- 15.4 mm s-1 compared with 68.5 +/- 12.4 mm s-1 in the control group (P < 0.0001). In contrast, the E/A ratio, deceleration time and heart rate did not differ significantly between the two groups. The results suggest that maximal longitudinal relaxation velocity is a simple and appropriate measure of diastolic function in patients with transmural AMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bojö et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: