Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial evaluates fitness maintenance in breast cancer survivors using group or individual training, suggesting flexible exercise prescriptions.
Background: While exercise is critical for breast cancer survivors, identifying prescriptions that promote long-term adherence is a challenge. This study evaluated whether survivors could maintain fitness gains during a 6-month self-managed phase following two distinct 12-week supervised programs. Specifically, we compared whether transitioning from one-on-one training to either individualized (Ind) or group-based (Gr) sessions influenced a participant’s ability to sustain improvements in strength, range of motion (ROM), and cardiorespiratory endurance (VO2peak). Methods: Thirty breast cancer patients from diverse backgrounds completed an initial 12-week supervised individual training program. They were then randomized into either Ind (n = 13) or Gr (n = 17) supervised sessions for a second 12-week phase. Fitness assessments were conducted at baseline, 3 months (post-initial training), and 1 year (after the 6-month self-managed phase). Data were analyzed using generalized estimating equations to evaluate the effects of time and training format. Results: Significant improvements were observed across all fitness categories over time. Muscular strength (bench press, plank, and squats) and VO2peak increased significantly by 3 months and were successfully maintained at the 1-year follow-up mark. Shoulder ROM also showed significant improvement at 1 year. Notably, the training format (group vs. individual) had no significant impact on these outcomes, with the exception of one ROM metric. Conclusions: Initial supervised exercise leads to significant fitness gains that breast cancer survivors can successfully maintain for at least six months through self-management. These gains are sustained regardless of whether the preceding supervised training was delivered in a group or individual format, suggesting flexibility in clinical exercise prescriptions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Merifield et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: